JBJS Editor’s Choice—Telerehab Just as Good as Hands-On Rehab after TKA

swiontkowski marc colorI selected this study from the July 15, 2015 Journal because it highlights where we need to be headed with innovation for musculoskeletal care. Health care budget pressures and patient satisfaction measurements are pushing us to develop cost-effective care that also offers greater patient convenience.

Dr. Helene Moffet and her colleagues conducted a well-designed, randomized controlled trial, and they found that in-home telerehabilitation was “noninferior” to face-to-face delivery of home-rehab services among more than 200 post-TKA patients. These are important findings, but I surmise that only patients who preferred care in the home and/or were equipped to manage the requisite technology agreed to be randomized. In fact, as Dr. Mark Spangehl observed in his accompanying Commentary, more than one-third of patients assessed for eligibility declined to participate in the study. “Patients who are less motivated or less computer savvy or are technologically adverse may not be able to navigate this type of system,” Dr. Spangehl wrote. Other patients will simply require the human touch to motivate them to work on strength, gait, and range of motion.

So, in addition to developing innovations like this that lower the total cost of care while maintaining or improving its quality, we need to conduct research that will identify the patients who will do well with  innovation and those who will do better with more traditional care. Today, this two-pronged type of systems-innovation research is essential for patients and health systems worldwide.

Marc Swiontkowski, MD

JBJS Editor-in-Chief

Tags: , ,

3 responses to “JBJS Editor’s Choice—Telerehab Just as Good as Hands-On Rehab after TKA”

  1. chris pape says :

    Marc,
    hope you are well.
    I really liked your comments on telerehabilitation ! The manuscript describes the use of this type of communication for elective surgeries.
    We have done the same thing for our geriatric fracture patients and received very good feedback – from patients and rehab centers.

    Would you be interested in publishing the results ?

    All the best,

    Chris Pape

    Like

    • Anonymous says :

      Chris,

      What system are you using for the telerehab? Have you looked in to Respondwell.com? I would be interested is getting your feedback.

      Anthony Kjenstad 310-628-5163

      Like

      • OrthoBuzz for Surgeons says :

        The following describes the telerehab system used in the Moffet et al study:

        “The technological platform was based on h264 videoconference codecs (Tandberg 550 MXP; Cisco Systems, San Jose, California) with clinician-controlled PTZ (pan, tilt, zoom) cameras and dedicated software that allowed real-time two-way video and audio interaction over the Internet between the clinician at a rehabilitation center and a patient at home. The platform had been tested in previous studies. It was installed in the home by a technician within a week of hospital discharge. The physiotherapist initiated the session at the time scheduled with the patient, and the patient had only to push a button to accept the communication and start the session.”

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: