JBJS Editor’s Choice—A More Aggressive Approach to Dens Nonunion

swiontkowski marc colorIn the February 3, 2016 JBJS study by Joestl et al., the authors report persistent radiographic nonunions in nearly 100% of 28 geriatric patients five years after being treated nonoperatively for a dens fracture nonunion. Traditionally these older patients were placed in halo vests or hard cervical collars, based on the rationale that frail, elderly patients might not survive upper-cervical fusion. That strategy, however, often results in skin problems, pin-site infections, and chronic upper-cervical and posterior-cranium pain.

With an increasingly elderly population looming during the next two decades, we will be seeing dens injuries and nonunions in higher numbers. The increased numbers of patients presenting with this injury may allow for a carefully planned multicenter randomized controlled trial, but I think the current status of information regarding this fracture is robust enough to suggest the following treatment approach: Much like the way we currently manage elderly patients with hip fractures, we should be prepared to more seriously consider operative treatment for patients over the age of 65 with a dens fracture—especially when there is concern about persistent nonunion and instability or development of neurological impairments. Although that may formerly have been considered an aggressive approach (and may still be ill-advised in high-surgical-risk patients), this study–plus systematic reviews of other smaller cohort studies–provides ample justification to consider proceeding operatively.

Marc Swiontkowski, MD

JBJS Editor-in-Chief

Tags: , , , , , , ,

One response to “JBJS Editor’s Choice—A More Aggressive Approach to Dens Nonunion”

  1. Andrew Clarke says :

    I have significant reservations in the tenor of this editorial. C2 fractures need to be treated on their own unique merits. Many fractures can be managed with soft collars and progress to non Union which is not often problematic.
    However, early care is necessary for significantly displaced fractures in our experience. We published one such case in the British JBJS in 2010.

    In fact over the years we have found that a posterior C1/C2 fixation to be well tolerated by the older patients.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: